- The difference in timbre between the two periods
- The difference in texture between the two periods
- The difference in instrumentation between the two periods
- The difference in vocal range between the two periods
- The difference in harmony between the two periods
- The difference in rhythm between the two periods
- The difference in melodic contour between the two periods
- The difference in form between the two periods
- The difference in notation between the two periods
- The difference in performance practice between the two periods
A question that many people ask is why does Renaissance music sound fuller than Medieval music? The answer lies in the era in which the music was composed.
Checkout this video:
The difference in timbre between the two periods
The difference in timbre between the two periods is largely due to the different tuning systems used. In the Renaissance, musicians began using what is known as just intonation, which allows for a wider range of harmonic possibilities. Just intonation offers a more resonant sound than the older meantone tuning system, which was used in the medieval period.
The difference in texture between the two periods
One major difference between the music of the Renaissance and the music of the Medieval period is the texture. The texture of a piece of music is how many different parts are talking at the same time, and how those parts fit together.
Renaissance music often has more than one melody happening at the same time. These different melodies are called “voices.” The voices might move together in harmony, or they might move in interesting ways against each other. You can think of it like having a conversation with more than one person at a time. Everyone is still talking, but there are different things being said.
Medieval music, on the other hand, often just has a single melody happening at a time. This was probably because instruments were not as advanced during the Medieval period, so it was hard to have more than one person playing at the same time. It’s also possible that people just didn’t think of adding more than one voice to their music yet!
If you listen to a piece of Renaissance music and a piece of Medieval music side-by-side, the Renaissance music will probably sound fuller and more complex. This is because there are more voices talking at the same time, so there is more going on for your brain to process.
The difference in instrumentation between the two periods
One of the main reasons why Renaissance music sounds fuller than Medieval music is the difference in instrumentation between the two periods. During the Medieval period, music was primarily played on string instruments like the lute. However, during the Renaissance period, a wider range of instruments were used including brass and woodwind instruments. This change in instrumentation led to a more full and rich sound in Renaissance music.
The difference in vocal range between the two periods
The average vocal range for males in the Renaissance was about one octave higher than it is today, and the average for females was about a fourth higher. This increase in range was due to the increased use of falsetto for males and the use of head voice for females. The upper ranges of both voices were used more frequently in Renaissance music than in medieval music, which contributed to the fuller sound.
While the typical vocal range increased during the Renaissance, there were still a limited number of pitches that could be sung with any degree of accuracy. This is why many Renaissance compositions sound similar to each other – composers were working within certain Pitch constraints. The medieval period saw a wider variety of pitches being used, as well as more experimentation with alternative scales and tuning systems. This greater variety of pitches helped to create a more varied soundscape and made medieval music sound less full than Renaissance music.
The difference in harmony between the two periods
Historically, the Renaissance was a time when Western harmony began to move away from medieval modal harmony. A mode is a set of rules governing which notes can be played in succession, and these rules were quite different in the two periods. In particular, chords became more important in Renaissance music, while in medieval music melodic lines were often more independent. This change helped to create a fuller sound in Renaissance music.
The difference in rhythm between the two periods
Renaissance music is full and rich sounding because of the change in rhythm that occurred during that period. In medieval music, the emphasis was on the melody with little regard for rhythm. This changed in the Renaissance when composers began to incorporating more than one melody line into their pieces, giving the music a fuller sound.
The difference in melodic contour between the two periods
Renaissance music is full sounding because of the way the composer used the notes and the instruments to produce sound. The notes in Renaissance music are more evenly spaced out, which gives the music a fuller sound. The melodies also have a lot of movement, which adds to the fullness of the sound. In addition, Renaissance composers used more instruments to play their music, which also contributed to the full sound.
The difference in form between the two periods
A piece of music from the Renaissance period will sound fuller than one from the Medieval period for a few reasons having to do with the difference in form between the two periods.
In the Renaissance, composers began to move away from the monophonic form that was predominant in the Medieval period. Monophonic music consists of a single melody line without any harmony or accompaniment. This is what most people think of when they think of Gregorian chant. In contrast, Renaissance composers began experimenting with adding accompaniment to their melodic lines, creating what we now know as polyphony. Polyphony is music that consists of two or more independent melodic lines. This creates a much fuller sound than monophony because there are many different things going on harmonically and melodically at the same time.
Renaissance composers also made use of something called homophony, which is a type of polyphony in which all the voices sing the same melody but with different harmonies underneath. This was often used in church music and led to the creation of some very beautiful and complex pieces such as Tallis’ “Spem in Alium.”
So, to sum up, Renaissance music sounds fuller than Medieval music because it makes use of polyphony and homophony, which create a richer texture than monophony.
The difference in notation between the two periods
The main difference between the sound of Renaissance and Medieval music is due to the difference in notation between the two periods. In the Renaissance, composer started to use a different system of notation which included more harmonic information. This made Renaissance music sound fuller and more complex than Medieval music.
The difference in performance practice between the two periods
The date we use to divide medieval and renaissance music is 1400, the beginning of the 15th century. This was not just a arbitrary date to historians, but rather a change that represents a shift in mindsets and composition styles that were developed over time. The two periods of music are noticeably different when you compare them side by side, with renaissance music sounding fuller and more complex than medieval music. One of the main reasons for this difference is performance practice; the way in which the music was meant to be played.